Yes, I think that is significant, if only internationally, as regards the countries we traditionally work with.
We have solid partnerships, namely with Holland, but also with Sweden and Belgium. Not using the same language that has been put in place over the years is not insignificant internationally. The term "gender" was not accepted overnight. Having it accepted was a long process. It started with gender mainstreaming at the United Nations. Next, the biggest battle on accepting and introducing the term "gender" in an international document took place at the International Criminal Court.
I remind you that when the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court was negotiated, the Canadian delegation was one of the delegations that actually defended including the term "gender" in the Rome Statute. That was in 1998. Twelve years later, what do we see in official documents? The removal of the term "gender". That is the first sign internationally.
I must also add a word about the need to conduct more in-depth studies on how that translates, practically speaking, in the implementation and definition of policies.
For the time being, personally, I cannot comment on that issue.