Then why are NGOs telling us the opposite of what you just said? I am referring specifically to the language used in serious conflicts, in Africa or elsewhere, such as in Rwanda or Burundi where women were systematically attacked.
We know that words play an important role in describing these conflicts. Why is no one using those words any more? NGOs have told us that. You are saying the opposite; but Mr. Weetman convened the meeting to look at how they could change the language or wording to propose different approaches at the departmental level in order to facilitate dialogue, if I understand correctly.