Thank you, Madam Chair.
I guess that's the brunt of my argument. Before you undertake a study, would it not be better for the committee to hear from the staff and the minister and then formulate what they want out of the study or review you're prepared to undertake?
I'm not arguing with the fact that the motion is sound and doable; I'm just asking whether we are doing it in reverse order. If you have the minister and the department staff here you can ask those questions. If you're not satisfied, then you can move forward to a study, a review, or an audit. I suspect they're sitting in their offices right now. They won't be listening to this debate because it's in camera, which surprises me as well.