Thank you very much.
This will be very quick because I only have the five minutes, but in the past... The study is looking into the participation of women in non-traditional occupations. To a great extent, I would include politics in that as well. Recently I was engaged in a debate about women in politics. You'll find that many countries in Europe are now fundamentally trying to change the system of how they elect people in order to get people engaged.
Am I looking at something similar here, to the effect that you want to change the system by which you've hired people over some time? Because the other side of the issue is that you can encourage women to get involved in politics by financing of campaigns, educating young women, advocacy, and that sort of situation. So you have two sides to getting people involved.
One of the issues you brought up was that you had to be physically present in order to answer a call. Now, I apologize; I don't quite understand how that works, as opposed to someone who is home all the time and who wants to get involved and is unable to do so. Is this the type of systemic change that you want to see? My question to you is that in the list you have currently, my colleague makes a good point about seniority, and there seems to be a fundamental way of... Given the problems you have with it, would you agree that the list he's talking about is a good thing in order to allow more women in politics?