It's totally our intention. We're only one year into our first attempt at doing this, and the blueprint projects were two-year projects for the most part, although I believe some were for three years. As the experience comes to its two-year point, we will be able to analyze our approach in detail.
So far what we have sought feedback on, on the part of groups, has been the application process and whether it was user-friendly. But as we advance we will be seeking input from groups on how the rest of the implementation panned out. We hope to have a much more coherent evaluation, so that rather than doing an evaluation project by project, we will be able to have clusters of projects doing similar things in different environments and learn something significant from this arrangement.