I can. I think the one thing we haven't spoken about this afternoon is.... We've talked about education and we've talked about gender-neutral education. I am a believer in and a proponent of single-gender education as well, both for young girls through high school and also for women in executive development.
About 20 years ago, Chubb created the first executive women's education program at an already-existing university in the U.S., Smith College, because we found that the programs at Harvard and Queens and other places that were promoting executive education were really not dealing effectively with engaging women in the classroom. There has certainly been an awful lot of research over the course of time that women and men, boys and girls, learn different things. We attribute that as the reason girls are not as strong potentially in the maths and sciences: it's because the teacher is telling Suzie not to get her dress dirty while the boys are begging the teacher to please pick them so they can light the propane tank on fire.
I think the concern in how we're educating women is that it is something we could and should continue to do differently. Even today when we send women—and we still send 10 women from Canada to that program in Massachusetts every year, and we use a lot of other executive curriculum—they come back feeling empowered. There's nothing like being part of the Judy Project at Rotman School of Management or this program of which I speak.
Women around each other have a little more power and engagement in the learning process. That's what I would recommend.