First, thank you so much for sharing that with us. It informs our work to know that in the Chinese community, a woman at the age of 70-odd years was feeling so bad that she felt the need and did feel the need and thankfully told people about it. I'm sorry; I feel very bad that people did not believe her. I think that's what we're all trying to combat today, in the work that we're undertaking.
With respect to program evaluation, definitely within the Public Health Agency what we're trying to achieve is knowledge of how these initiatives have made a difference and how they can be measured going forward. I have to be honest with you and say that it would be very easy for us to be able to tabulate what has been done under the initiative by being able to tell you about the number of reports that have been published and the number of meetings we've had and the number of interactions we faced, but that doesn't get at the actual outcome around the initiative.
As I said, it's day seven for me, so one of the things that's on my agenda is being able to speak with my colleagues and be able to determine what the best approach is with respect to evaluating where we've come to date. Is it the appropriate time now to be evaluating that? Or is there value in being able to wait until the full effects of some of the federal initiatives have gone forward? Then, prescriptively—in other words, not just five years from now, but say within 12 to 24 months—we'll be able to better assess the value of the initiatives and how those tools are being used. That's what I would like to get at. So those discussions will be forthcoming.