It's a very good question. You know, this is what statisticians do: we try to figure out what is the best way to measure a concept. Harassment is not an easy concept to try to measure.
Our focus-group testing suggested that the approach that we took was one that could be responded to by respondents. We would have shown them the description of harassment, the definition of harassment that I read to you, and asked them if they understood the definition. Then the following questions that related to that definition were respondable by the respondent.
Given that, I don't think we looked at the alternative measurement of the concept of harassment that you suggest. It's not something that we couldn't entertain in the future. We have to be careful, though. If we whole-scale replace the way that we've measured in the past with a new way of measuring, you aren't going to be able to compare the 29% that we got with this to the survey in the future.