My interpretation is that it's probably a little bit of both. They are engaged. We had a strong communications program to make sure that all employees were aware that this questionnaire was in their inbox, so there was a lot of work from the deputy minister level down, in all the organizations, to make sure that employees responded, and as completely as possible.
The closer you get to 100%, the higher the quality of the estimates. There probably are some respondents who were more engaged as a result of the fact that they might have felt discouraged in the workplace. On the other hand, there might have been as many people who were excited to brag about their organization, which could counteract that effect.
So we don't know, but to sum up, I think certainly the engagement strategy we had was an effective one, and then employees themselves might feel some natural engagement as a result of different factors.