If we use, as an example, a harassment-related case, that case would have gone through a process internally before we saw it, and there would have been a decision made internally at the first level. We are involved at the appeal level.
If either party decided to bring it to the next level, then we would get the case. We would review it. We'd prepare a report and we'd provide findings and recommendations to the Commissioner of the RCMP. Then once the file reached the commissioner's desk, he would make a final decision. And as I said, the law is very clear that he must consider the ERC recommendation, and if he doesn't accept it, he has to explain why.
That's the end of the process, except if a member were to bring it to the court for judicial review.