Sure, and I think there are two parts to my answer.
The first one is that one of the key changes in the philosophy underlying the most recent version of the policy was to shift from a crime-and-punishment approach to harassment to a restorative justice approach. This means that except in the most egregious cases, what you want to do is restore some element of harmony to the workplace and preserve the sense of teamwork and cohesion that are essential to an effectively functioning defence team.
To keep the resolution as low-level as possible is the desired method. Given what our statistics from the 1998 survey show, which is that most sexual harassment incidents were of a verbal nature involving teasing, inappropriate remarks, and that kind of thing, it makes sense to resolve them at a low level: correct the behaviour, tell people what they're doing wrong, tell them what they should be doing, make restitution, and then get back to work.