There is no Treasury Board policy specific to sexual harassment; it's a generalized policy on dealing with harassment.
The concern we have, and I believe I mentioned it at the last sitting, is that the trend appears to be for Treasury Board to shrink its core policy and rely upon departments to develop their own policies. The concern we have, which was also mentioned by PSAC in their brief, is that, for example, this particular iteration of Treasury Board harassment policy has removed certain things—for example, the responsibilities of various parties.
Within its dealing with responsibilities of various parties, the old policy made it very clear to complainants that they had an entitlement to review a draft report into their harassment complaint before it was finalized. It's been our experience with a number of departments, but more particularly with the RCMP, that this has been a failure, with the consequence that the report is incomplete, that the findings are as a consequence inaccurate, and that as a consequence there is no successful resolution of the complaints at hand. This subsequently leads to other processes available to public servants under various pieces of legislation.