I can't think of specific examples off the top of my head. Certainly if there is anything of a sexual nature that's contained as an offence within the code of service discipline, that would constitute sexual misconduct. The defence administrative orders and directive on sexual misconduct is fairly clear.
I come back to our role to investigate those things that constitute an offence under the code of service discipline or the Criminal Code. For example, section 264 of the Criminal Code of Canada has criminal harassment, and it's very clear. That's a crime. That's not an administrative measure. That's not sexual harassment. That's criminal harassment. Section 271 of the Criminal Code is sexual assault; where there's touching, it automatically turns into sexual assault.
How you deal with those particular issues is really the purview of the commanding officer. He will consult with his advisers and find the best way to deal with it. It's based largely on.... One of the factors, of course, is complainant input. If the complainant says, “Look, I just want this to stop” in a case of harassment, and we talk to the individual and tell them it's not on and it won't happen again, and the complainant is happy with that, then in my mind, in my unit that would suffice. We would monitor the individual as we went along. But clearly, where a crime has been committed, we need to investigate and we need to take action, because that is not tolerated within the Canadian Forces.