All the time. What I tried to get to in my comments, though probably a little more generally, is that people who live on reserve, whether facing issues of matrimonial real property or not, come to urban centres and ask where they do these things and how the city works. It's like a foreign country. It's like moving to Paris. Where do I get my basic services, and how do I live? That is not always crystal clear. There aren't always service centres where you can go and figure it out. That's what friendship centres were originally there to do. The original concept of a friendship centre is a familiar face with a familiar language who says you need that, you need to go over here, even if you're pointing at a United Way service, or a government service, or whatever it is. So it's that ability to help those who need help when they need it. That's why it's called friendship.
This is really a point about long-term planning. Legislative changes are fine, and I won't speak to the law and the legalities of Bill S-2 and how the bill is written. What we're speaking of here is the planning that comes both before and after that. How do we pick up the pieces?
Mixing social issues is very complex in the urban environment. I would suggest a lot of thinking has to go in as implementation happens about where people are going to get service. If you have a year's waiting period, that's going to be a busy year, I bet, for people to figure out how they are going to do this. Yes, a legal centre of excellence is proposed for first nations to access, and that's great, but there's a human component that I want to talk about, and that human component needs to figure it out. They're going to ask what happens in one year.