Can I ask one more question about that, because I'm hoping to be able to get to this point. We understand the point you're making. This is not a panacea for all of the ills, and it's not intended to be able to fix every problem. But it is intended to try to go after this issue of matrimonial property rights not only for women but for men, and it's something that you've raised in the past in your testimony before committee.
The Frontier Centre for Public Policy has a very interesting study that showed that 42% of respondents—over 1,000 respondents—they studied on 78 bands said that they didn't feel that band governments were yet addressing this issue well enough. Now some are, but in the interim this is intended as a measure to help those women and men who are in this very difficult situation to be able to have a measure of protection until first nations people come up with their own solutions for that. Can we agree that might be an appropriate way to move forward?