Thank you.
Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the committee. I very much appreciate this opportunity to speak to you today about the matter of eating disorders. It's a subject that I have devoted the first five years of my professional career to.
I speak to you today principally from the perspective of a clinician. I spend most of my working hours engaged in the treatment of eating disorders. On any given day, I meet with patients of all ages who are suffering with these often severe and complex conditions. I also meet with worried, desperate parents. I meet with exhausted spouses. I meet with the siblings and children of those who are struggling to recover from or simply to cope with eating disorder symptoms. I deal with a lot of fear and anger, as well as confusion and denial.
As you have heard in your inquiry thus far, eating disorders are amongst the most lethal of all mental health conditions. They affect young women, significantly distorting what could otherwise be a normal developmental trajectory through adolescence, thereby establishing the conditions for further mental illness throughout their lives. These conditions are almost never present without significant co-morbid symptoms, principally those of depression and anxiety, but self-harm, substance abuse, and other impulse control problems are also often present.
What is less measurable here, and by far more meaningful to the individual, is the extent of the suffering these diseases exact on patients and their families—the broader toll on society. From my unique, and I would say, privileged vantage point, I can tell you that the suffering created by eating disorders is immense.
Through my affiliation with the University of Calgary, I provide education and mentorship to medical students and resident physicians at various levels of training. In my lectures, I generally begin by explaining what eating disorders are not. They are not the result of personal choice, they are not glamorous, they are not minor, they are not phases, and they are not the result of bad parenting, etc.
I often feel like I'm starting at a deficit. I'm working against a powerful media force, and in some cases, an already rigid set of societal beliefs about what eating disorders are and what people with eating disorders are like. Without excessive digression, I will point out what is obvious.
We live in a time and place where female beauty is often equated to power. Sadly, the belief is that to be beautiful is to be thin, so to the fresh eager ears of medical students, it's often difficult for them to truly appreciate what is so bad about the pursuit or attainment of thinness.
I believe that this is where some of the issues in treatment begin, at the beginning. All stakeholders, and in particular, all physicians need to understand what eating disorders are. They need to be taught how to diagnose these conditions and generally how to manage them until people can access comprehensive specialized treatment centres.
Beyond this, they need to be prepared to deliver a diagnosis that the patient may not like or may deny. In other words, they need to be prepared for the discomfort that is often required in treating a patient who is often unable to be compliant or who may not have the investment in the diagnosis. They need also some preparation in how to talk to parents and partners about the condition, because without this alliance a physician's power is reduced to the few moments they spend with a patient in their office.
Knowledge of eating disorder management must extend beyond the realm of family physicians, pediatricians, and psychiatrists. Almost all practising physicians will encounter individuals with eating disorders. Making the diagnosis and taking timely, appropriate next steps is crucial and can be life-saving.
To strengthen my argument about the need for better management of eating disorder patients by all physicians, regardless of specialty, I will provide you with the following vignette, which literally took place only yesterday.
I received a call from an experienced internist who was concerned about a patient she had recently seen. It was an 18-year-old woman who had experienced unexplained weight loss over the preceding two years. Her medical status was so severe that she had a BMI of 13 and was in renal failure. After a comprehensive assessment, the internist felt confident that the individual had a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa. When she attempted to share her views with the patient and her mother, both rejected the diagnosis and became angry at the mere suggestion of it.
Worried and conflicted about what to do next, the internist placed a call to the two other specialists who had seen the patient and to the GP who made the referral. None of these individuals had considered the diagnosis of anorexia. Instead, multiple expensive and invasive tests had been done to find the elusive cause of her weight loss.
She spoke to one of her colleagues whose response was not to be too hasty in making the diagnosis of anorexia. Instead, the plan was to pursue rare and highly unlikely malabsorption syndromes, what we call “zebras" in the medical world. The physician's response to the possibility that the condition was anorexia nervosa was revealing. He said, "Let's give her a chance. It still might be something else".
The internist was calling me because she had no idea how to proceed. She knew what the diagnosis was, but no one—not the patient, not the parent, not the other physicians involved—wanted to call it what it was, not the rare zebra, but the unfortunately common horse, anorexia nervosa, with a prevalence in young woman of between 5% and 10%. This exemplifies how physicians may deny or fail to see eating disorder diagnoses and thereby significantly impact a young person's chances of recovery. In this case, this young person had been ill for two years, had dropped out of school and sports, which she had previously excelled at, and was walking around the city of Calgary at a dangerously low BMI and at risk of further decline and sudden death.
I hope the committee can appreciate with this story the challenges that physicians face and the complexity of providing doctors with necessary support and information at critical junctures during their training.
I will leave this topic with a sobering fact: exposure to eating disorder treatment programs is optional even in psychiatric residency training programs.
With regard to treatment, I have been the medical director of the Calgary eating disorder program for two years. In this capacity, I have had a twofold focus. First, our program needs to provide evidence-based treatment to those who suffer from eating disorders. Second, we need to provide service in such a way as to meet the needs of southern Albertans. In short, we are not providing adequate services if patients must navigate a long wait list to access our care, because every day that goes by before a patient is comprehensively and effectively treated is another day in which their disorder can grow stronger and another day in which patients become more removed from who they were before the eating disorder entered their lives. It is a time when suffering expands.
Timely, appropriate access to good-quality care is imperative in the treatment of eating disorders, and in most parts of the country we are failing.
In my view, there are some ways we can make the situation better.
First, there should be mandatory comprehensive education of all medical students and resident physicians on the subject of eating disorders.
Next, there should be a mandatory requirement that publicly funded programs practise evidence-based treatment, not just whatever the flavour of the month is, not just what individual clinicians would like to do. Funding for infrastructure and training must be driven with the goal of delivering evidence-based care, and the resources must match the scale of the problem and what is required to deliver that care. Better mechanisms must be put in place to support physicians treating individuals in the community and for those working in remote and rural areas.
Finally, mechanisms through which programs can interact, share data, and collaborate on research to accelerate understanding must be established and supported.
With that, I'll say thank you so very much for this opportunity to contribute to this important work.