Not occupying a body that is easily understood to be suffering from an eating disorder may also complicate the process of recovery. Weight restoration and normalized eating are generally considered pillars of eating disorder treatment programs. When new instructions are given to individuals to develop new patterns of behaviour around food and exercise, these are often in direct opposition to the prescriptions for health that are offered to the general population. Recovery in such a context can be extraordinarily difficult. To borrow one of my participant's words, “For people who already feel so alone and want to belong, to ask them to do something countercultural can be really scary.”
Recovery itself is poorly understood. While individuals may see recovery as a process rather than an outcome, clinicians require biomedical criteria through which to gauge recovery.
More funding for research in this area would help to explore individuals' and families' understandings of recovery and the resources they require to achieve it.
Although we can see the evidence base growing around mainstream approaches such as cognitive behavioural therapy, currently existing models may not resonate for all individuals. One size does not fit all in eating disorder treatment. Our knowledge based around treatment primarily stems from studies conducted at programs that are currently funded, which are often generally in hospital contexts. It could be that other forms of treatment, for example, narrative therapy, which is often employed in fee-for-service community practice could be highly effective as well.
“Evidence-based” may mean that someone has been able to gather a large enough sample size to conduct a randomized controlled trial of the approach. Strong quantitative studies that test and compare various forms of treatment are still lacking.