Yes, this has been suggested, but if that were truly the purpose, then why is it that women who live in households where the couple's total income is $32,000 a year and less only get $14 per year?
Similarly, for people who live in households where the incomes are in the middle range--$68,000 to $83,000 per year--why would the unpaid work being supported by that be worth only $546? And why would it make sense then, where there's a single income earner with income of $190,000 a year or more, that the woman's unpaid work in that household is suddenly worth $12,000 a year?
If that were the purpose, someone got the numbers very badly wrong.