We would support everything in that motion, except for the reference to “earliest convenience”. Unfortunately in this committee we've seen that phrase give an extensive window and one that leads to receiving the minister only once to speak on the ministry.
We believe a timeline that is also reflective of the timeliness of the supplementary estimates is essential. I believe that the minister would also appreciate a clear directive from us, and an indication that this is a very important presentation, and we believe it should happen sooner than later.