That's a really difficult question.
One of the things your committee could recommend, at least using the lens of women in particular, is that we start by addressing what processes we can use and what negotiations we can start to make sure this issue of foreign accreditation is addressed fairly for both women and men.
I'm going to guess that internationally educated professionals who are women may feel a little bit diffident about going up against the credentialing organizations, as I'm sure is your experience. Many times when you go to a lab to get blood work and chat with the woman who is taking your blood, you realize she was actually a doctor in her country of origin.
It seems to me that one possible lever would be to focus first on the women's side. But again, I realize that's a little bit tricky because then it's going to be a matter of, what about the others?
I certainly think there's a case to be made that we could start by looking at how to ensure that women are given a fair shake and assessed properly by the credentialing organizations.
I've noticed with internationally educated professionals who are women that some may be more diffident than others to argue for why they should be recognized and treated as doctors, which indeed they have been in their countries of origin.