Sure. You know, it is passed. My feeling about it is there are some really good provisions in it about criminalizing the non-consensual sharing of intimate images. I think that is positive. I think it's unfortunate that it was coupled with provisions that look like they may very well contravene the charter around rights to privacy. It's unfortunate because I think that the legislation will likely be challenged in court and it will ultimately delay the application of what I think is a very positive development which, as I say, is the criminalization of the non-consensual sharing of images.
I would have liked to see that bill split in order for the piece that's positive to progress on its own in a way which I think everybody agrees with, that this is a really important provision to have in there and to criminalize directly, because there are no other laws that can do what that provision does, and it was really necessary to get through. I am concerned that the entire piece of legislation will be bogged down in litigation as it goes forward. I would have liked to see the provisions that probably will violate rights to privacy separated and to have a separate debate.