—and we will be able to identify what works best, what works in certain circumstances, and what works in limited circumstances. Not every evaluation will show that everything works for a given situation, but it will hopefully allow us to identify the success factors for where it should be used as a recipe. That's our broader evaluation strategy.
Also, we have a strategy whereby each project, once it's selected, has interim reporting and final close-outs that have to be submitted. We are able to assess each and every project, how successful they were at meeting the key results. We then look at the projects within a stream. Now we're able to start doing that because we launched this approach of calls for proposals, a directive for calls for proposals, nearly three years ago. We are getting the first batch of projects that are closing and we will be able to assess clusters of projects that were addressing a similar issue and learn lessons from that.
Every year we also look at all the projects that closed, either a sampling of them or the totality of them, depending on the interest for that specific year. We identify what results were achieved for that cluster of projects that have closed.
We do evaluations at a number of levels. Hopefully for us all the pieces fit together, and these give us a very good indication of where we should be tweaking and adjusting the program in its next iteration.