Sure, just quickly on mentoring, while I absolutely agree that it's critical to get more women in mentoring roles, I would not like to do it at the exclusion of engendering men in helping with this. I have a Ph.D. in physiology and some of the best mentors I've ever had in my entire career have been men. So it really is getting under that cultural piece of doing that.
On STEM, I've been scratching my head about it for 20 years and I'm actually at the point of nearly giving up and just adopting the global acronym and trying to get it out there as something. The U.S. has adopted it. The last 10 years they've been using it. It's a globally used acronym that Canada is really just picking up. It's very difficult, and in my favourite world it would just be a case of saying that we are living, we are alive, and this is an integrated approach to what we need to do for the 21st and 22nd centuries. However, you can only hit your head against the wall for so long and say, okay if people understand STEM to be this, then let's make sure they understand that. If you can come up with an answer, I will adopt it and spread it out there, because we're struggling.