One of the most important things that the agency undertakes is programs for at-risk children and their parents. One of the things that actually struck me when I was preparing for this committee was in looking at levels of income of people who have reported eating disorders. I was really struck that, of those who presented with eating disorders, at least 61% are reporting income in the lowest percentile. I think there's a misnomer that people assume that those who suffer with eating disorders—and I heard it at this committee—are those in the highest income brackets.
Some of the projects we're undertaking are, for example, the community action program for children, aboriginal head start in urban and northern communities, and the Canadian prenatal nutrition program. On an annual basis, those investments are around $115 million. We support community-based projects for ages zero to six and also, in aboriginal head start, ages three to five. We're looking at giving those at-risk children and their parents the greatest start they can get in life, as best as possible. To look at early childhood development, to look at better mental health promotion, to understand anger and aggression, and to foster more positive parenting; those are the focuses of those programs, as well as nutrition and good nutrition practice. Again, the issues around preventing abuse, preventing violence, and preventing anger are things that are very tangible.
I hope that answers your question.