I find it an interesting comment, because the way our electoral system is structured is first past the post, so parties don't necessarily have the opportunity to look at their candidates and shuffle them around. In your view, however, you're saying that is a common practice, that parties would look at their slate of 338 candidates, and then decide that women are going to go into the ridings that are non-winnable and the men are going into ridings that are winnable. That's what was communicated in your opening remarks. Is that correct?
On June 5th, 2018. See this statement in context.