From the perspective of Daughters of the Vote, as our signature initiative, we were incredibly deliberate about who we chose, in part because of the kinds of questions we asked, and then what criteria we applied to the evaluation of those questions. I think you certainly have to invest earlier in communities and in women who don't necessarily see themselves fully reflected in the political process. We see Daughters of the Vote as really a 10-, 15-, or 20-year investment down the road for who identifies and feels comfortable in political spaces.
On our national board, we now have an equity committee that is in fact looking at exactly this question: where can we go as a country in ensuring sufficient representation among communities that have historically not been well represented, whether they indigenous, ethnocultural, rural, or what have you?
The conversation is really robust, but we believe that our model for Daughters of the Vote was extremely successful in identifying 67 indigenous women to be part of the program, and promoting a lot of cross-cultural conversation while they were here.