Thanks.
I wanted to add that I think the misconception about GBA is that it's an add-on, something you do after you've done all of your work.
I think people who do it understand it's part of good policy-making. I'm not sure it would be correct to say only CIC is doing it; it's more that only CIC is mandated to report it. There are a lot of analysts in government who know that doing gender analysis is simply part of doing a full analysis of any issue. Some are doing it intuitively without calling it GBA. Sometimes it's drawing people's attention to practices they're already engaged in, as opposed to having them feel this is some extra thing they need to do at the end, or that it's extra work.