If our objective is alleviating poverty—let's stick with that for a moment—and the other objective is that the programs apply in a universal way, and they apply equally to Canadians who fit the eligibility requirements, if you have that kind of a spread, and it's linked to gender such that men are doing 40% better than senior women, you have to get underneath that to understand why that is. So yes, it would signal an issue.
At the end of the day, the interventions that you use to address it may be quite varied. It may not result in “These people are getting too much, so we'll reduce it”; you'll use a whole bunch of different interventions to deal with it. But the goal remains, at the front end, that you have a universal program that applies in an equitable way to all those who are eligible. If in the results you see disparities, you have to inquire as to why that is.