Good question. I don't think I have a specific answer for you. If you are going to go the route of saying that there should be a government policy, then the policy parameters need to be fleshed out. Usually you would have some principles that you want observe. In essence, you would probably support the fundamental position that Status of Women put forward. This would require a demonstration that you have looked at whether your policy might affect the two genders differently, whether you have looked at how it might affect people participating in those programs, and whether you would be able to take into account data as well as the perspective of different groups that might be affected. You would have to demonstrate how you analyzed this. It might call for a more documented analysis, as opposed to more intuitive thinking. In any policy instrument, you would have the basic principles that you need to observe, and you may need to lay out the roles and responsibilities of who's going to do what. If all the organizations have a robust challenge function, then at the external level you might need less, but everybody might not be at the same place.
