Yes, I can give you the example of the aboriginal forestry initiative, and I think that was in 2011 or 2012, so it predates the conversation we're having about mandatory GBA+ in NRCan, but that's a tangible example where running a gender-based lens and doing a gender-based analysis with data helped inform the program design in a way that was more sensitive. I think, at the end of the day, it led to a better program as a result, to the point that thinking about data and looking at diversity and different perspectives is part of doing good public policy.
On May 5th, 2016. See this statement in context.