Is it fair that even if there is a disproportionate impact on one gender versus another, at least the information is known? It ends up being a balancing act or a political decision, but the information is in the hands of the decision-makers. I guess another way to put it is that it doesn't mean that all the decisions are gender-neutral decisions or are going to benefit men and women equally, but at least there's transparency for the cabinet around the implications of what they're deciding.
On May 10th, 2016. See this statement in context.