I think we have to start at the basic level. The reason for my comment on the manual was that if you say it's another policy, it's actually not a policy. It's a useful tool and a guide. There is a difference. This is something that's used at the coal face, and I do hear that everything gets labelled “policy” when that is not in fact what it is. Within our culture—we are very large—having that tool available to you, as well as on an app that can be accessed from anywhere in the world, is quite a valuable piece.
As it relates to policy, a unified policy approach is one of the recommendations out of the Deschamps report, and we are actively working on that. As with anything, it is complex. We do want to make sure that it's been through a GBA+ process to make sure all aspects are there.
In addition, my job is to be the universal translator to make sure that the advice we're receiving from the sexual misconduct response centre, and ultimately from the external advisory council, actually can be read and be usable for the CAF. That consultative process and that development process take time. Where we are right now is that we have usable and valuable tools that we have put in place as we come up with unified policy.
I'll go back to your original comment, which was, what does policy do? What people on the ground need is a tool that's usable. It's a decision tree. It's about knowing how to look after people. It is about having a manual that doesn't just apply to “Here's your cookbook, chain of command”. This is also for people who are affected and it can be accessed from anywhere in the world. Putting those useful pieces in place is very important.
To go back to the question about education—