Off the top of my head, a sex- and gender-based analysis would consider at least three things:
One is that women live longer than men. The average life expectancy for women in this country is about 82 or 83 now, and for men it's 79. There is the gender gap. Women also have a quality-of-life disadvantage in that they live longer with more disability. That is just the health expectancy proportion of the population that is going to need to be served. It is going to be disproportionately women. They will consume more medications, and they will have more chronic disease.
The second thing would be income. We know that older women are twice as likely to be below the poverty line than men. That might be gender. Maybe they didn't work; maybe they didn't have the pension plan. For the non-covered services, such as physio or psychotherapy for grief and things like that, they will not be able to access those non-covered services and will be put on medication.
I think that is my time, so you won't get the third one.