Excellent. I find that the criminal standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt” makes it discouraging for someone to prove under that standard that something may have happened online, especially when law enforcement hasn't caught up to the technology. However, if you had a perfect world and you could design the system from scratch within a human rights or civil context, should we stick to the balance of probabilities in the civil context, or is there a different threshold we should be using?
On October 5th, 2016. See this statement in context.