Yes, and that is specifically in Ontario.
I'm sorry, but I'm going to answer your question in English; my French isn't up to snuff.
We know that policing services in Ontario specifically have what we call “unfounded” rates that are alarming. We're in Ottawa right now; the Ottawa police have an unfounded rate of 40%. That means that 40% of the women who come to Ottawa police with a claim of having been sexually victimized are turned away at the door, so the police refuse to even investigate, let alone go forward with a prosecution. After that we can follow through with attrition, which means that for those 60% who do engage in a police investigation, there's a high attrition rate again at the prosecutorial level, as crown prosecutors make a decision about whether or not a case is worthy of taking to trial.
We end up with somewhere between 5% and 10% in the province of Ontario—and I would argue that it's comparable across the country—that do go to trial, and then there are the convictions that we see as a result. Of 100% of of sexual assaults, somewhere between 5% and 10% go to prosecution; maybe 1% of those will result in a conviction and a guilty finding, so you can see why victims themselves have very little faith in attaining any kind of justice from the system, because their chances of finding a guilty verdict are slim. Then once a guilty verdict is found, sentencing is usually very permissive.
I'm not an advocate of heavy-handed sentencing, because as I said in my presentation, I think we really need to be putting our energies into preventing sexual assaults in the first place. When we're dealing with reporting and investigation, we're closing the barn door after the horse has run. What we want to see in this country is not.... As my colleague said, anywhere from one in five to one in six women have experienced sexual assault before turning 25; that's unacceptable. We need to prevent that from happening in the first place, before they even need to go to police or any other reporting mechanism.