I'll try to keep it short so that Danika can also have some speaking time.
When it comes to good examples, York University has developed a pretty comprehensive and, I think, exemplary program. The sexual violence support centres on campus are almost entirely run by students, so it's peer to-peer-support. These students are paid, which is excellent, because we want to make sure the young people aren't taking on this work without being remunerated. They have quite a bit of representation at the policy development committee of their institution. York in particular, I think, is an institution that has dealt with a lot of reports around sexual violence, but they have also talked at length about the importance of integrating their student community and the community of survivors that are on their campus and in and around it.
On education for men, I think that this aspect is critically missing on a lot of our campuses, and too often, it is student groups who are leading these discussions.
I've yet to see individual campuses that have done any of this programming work. Some student unions, in particular the Student Federation of the University of Ottawa about a year ago was hosting something called “guy talks” on their campus, where they talked about toxic masculinity, what that looks like, and how gender-based violence also affects male students on our campuses.
Those that I have mentioned are talked about, and I think they're acutely felt by those that exist even beyond that binary, you know, with queer and transgendered students, as well.