If I may, I would add another point. One of the things we observed when we looked at the 19 that did implement the GBA+ framework, which another member highlighted earlier, was that the weak area is the sixth element. There are six elements to the GBA framework in terms of practices that Status of Women has suggested. The one weak spot is reporting.
Reporting helps with transparency and accountability. If there is not a lot of information there, people don't know about it and don't ask questions about it. In terms of external reporting at the departmental level, there was virtually none. People don't know if things were done or not done, or if something was done and there were no gender impacts, or if there were some but they didn't care to mention it.
Status of Women can also step up to give you more of an overall state of play, which isn't happening. What they have done is highlight some activities that have been going on, which is useful, but if they can tell you.... You don't have to wait for an Auditor General's report to tell you that 19 out of 25 were implemented, right? On an annual basis, Status of Women has a formal reporting instrument. Through that, they can say that so many have committed, so many have been implemented, and that this is what they see. That gives this committee more information in order to understand if there has been progress, if the progress is good, and if it is up to your expectations. If not, you can ask questions.
I think reporting is another way to help with transparency and accountability. That might help to move the file forward as well.