As you know, any of the projects that go forward through approvals by Natural Resources or other departments are subject to that gender-based analysis plus. In the case of those specific projects, I don't know if I can speak to the details of that analysis specifically, just because I don't know them offhand, but I can certainly get back to you on the specifics of those projects.
I would say generally that we are very aware of the differences between the impacts on women and men from natural resources development. I mentioned earlier the remote community aspects of a lot of natural resource development, the fact that fly-in/fly-out operations can have really disruptive impacts on family life. We know, for example, that when there are new natural resource projects, there can be inflationary impacts on communities with a disproportionate impact on women. These are all things that we look at when we're studying projects. They are part of the calculation that goes into a policy-maker's decision on this.
What I would say, though, is that the natural resource economy of the future will not look like the one of our parents or grandparents. Increasingly for industries that were driven by brawn, the stereotypical pick axe and lumberjack, a lot of these operations will be run by an iPad 10 years from now, and they will be much more open to that balance.