Okay, fantastic.
Andrea, going back to you, we talked about the 600 hours being too high a ceiling for many women to get to. Rationally, if you're looking at just the numbers, that's 37.5 hours in a 16-week period over a 52-week envelope.
You also mentioned that maybe the work is precarious for women, but at the same time how do we do this? I recognize that there are the employment insurance options for men or women, and if they're entrepreneurs they can put money aside, but what is the holdup? Are you saying that women who are working part time cannot get up to that 16 weeks of 52-week employment, or are you saying that women are working maybe on contract and that sometimes it should be the employer who should be paying into that?
What is the link here? I think if we're looking at it, many of us have said, well 16 weeks doesn't seem like a lot of time out of a 52-week period, so why are we not making those contributions when, if you're in the workforce, those are mandatory contributions in the first place?