It's a very good question.
The first step would be if the wage replacement rates were higher, for example, if in the rest of Canada we had the same wage replacement rates as Quebec, where the wage replacement rates are 75%.
If we started with higher wage replacement rates that recognize that it's really hard for a family to sustain 55% of pay over a long period of time, and it's really hard for men to give up their pay and take 55% of their pay. If we even just look to Quebec and raise the wage replacement rate, then we would be asking for less of a burden from employers. That would be the first step for me. I think that's where the problem starts: the eligibility criteria needs to be reworked.