Thank you.
Of course, the reason that we want to do GBA+, and want a gender lens on policy isn't for its own sake, but because we want to see in the end result an improvement in the material well-being of women and girls in this country.
When I went through the budget, I noted that having a gender lens seems to have had a tangible result in terms of what is in the budget, not just in the areas like child care, housing, homelessness, and flexible working hours. If you look at the section on international relations and trade or you look at tax policy, in all of these sections there are references to women. Do you think that's because we did use a gender lens on the budget? Is that a direct result of having looked at every area of the budget according to its impact on women?