Thank you. I feel that you're enforcing my point yet again, that the problem is not whether or not they're attending but the content of the courses they're receiving.
My next question is with regard to judicial independence. One of the things that was brought up is that this could perhaps infringe on that. Now, you've gone ahead and made the training mandatory. You've decided that this doesn't infringe on their judicial independence, yet somehow this bill, this legislation on the table, might. It appears there's some cherry-picking going on in terms of what infringes on judicial independence and what doesn't.
Can you clarify that for me, please?