The rationale is that we heard there is a need for the ongoing evaluation of the training for judges. This could be in addition to the annual report that's referenced in proposed subsection 62.1(2) of this bill.
There are new cases every year, so improving the training with new jurisprudence would be beneficial to the improvement of judges' training. We want to make sure there is a requirement that the training remain relevant. The commissioner could be the judge of that.
I'll leave it at that.