I fully agree with your rationale and the need for this. It's just that it wasn't within the scope of the bill. That's why the ruling was as it was.
Is there any further discussion on that?
On May 11th, 2017. See this statement in context.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Marilyn Gladu
I fully agree with your rationale and the need for this. It's just that it wasn't within the scope of the bill. That's why the ruling was as it was.
Is there any further discussion on that?
See context to find out what was said next.