Yes, you don't have to stay.
Anyway, there are three little corrections.
First, paragraph 2 says “decisions that are currently recorded and not reported”. They want to strike everything after “decisions”. They want to report “decisions”, because otherwise it gets into the weeds about what those decisions are.
The second one is that this letter actually calls for all case decisions to be put online. I think the intent of the committee was just for the sexual assault cases to be put online.
The third one is that this draft recommends that they expand the available training to “judges in the provincial court”. There's a recommendation that instead we refer to “provincially appointed judges” instead of the courts, because the courts are all named different things.
It's mostly grammatical changes that are being suggested.
Is there any discussion?
Ms. Malcolmson.