Correct me, Sheila, if I'm wrong. I think your suggestion was to say that if they're flexible and they could come later, we could hear from a couple of witnesses. That would give Pam time to make good on her undertaking to speak to the minister or the department and revisit this issue maybe over the next couple of meetings. I think everybody thinks we should get them here. If we can add a little ammunition to our request by hearing testimony and then saying that we heard X, Y, and Z, and we want the department's perspective, I think that would be a prudent approach.
On November 30th, 2017. See this statement in context.