I'll make just a quick comment on the new offence that my colleague referenced, section 162.1, the non-consensual distribution of intimate images offence. That is a very useful tool in the sexting context in particular.
We heard from prosecutors and investigators that the only tool they had to address that kind of behaviour was the child pornography offences related to images of youth under the age of 18. That was considered to be quite a heavy hammer in the context of sexting, which usually involves two teens who are certainly engaging in behaviour that is undesirable but probably doesn't reach the level of child pornography, pedophilia, etc.
That offence allows criminal justice officials to exercise discretion and use section 162.1 in cases that are more akin to what we might see adults doing when there is a breakup and intimate images taken in private context are shared inappropriately. That has assisted immensely, we're told by prosecutors, in these types of cases, which are so common to the cyberbullying context.