I'm going to cut you off there because you're not actually addressing my question.
There are women across this country who have significant concerns with this budget. They weren't as impressed with it as perhaps you would have thought they would be. Many women feel it's inappropriate for two middle-aged white guys with trust accounts to dictate to them what their choices in life should be.
In your budget, you outline that women aren't contributing as much to the economy as men, and therefore they should step up and get full-time work instead of part-time work. You are even so prescriptive as to say they should be entering STEM fields and trades to help contribute to the economy by way of taxation, in order to make up for the debt load your government is incurring.
Now, women don't like you to be telling them what to do, so their response is this. Only 16% of women are more likely to vote Liberal. Meanwhile, 38% are less likely to vote for your government in the next election. That's 38% who are less likely to vote for your government because they're offended by your budget.
Does that mean these women are also neanderthals in the same way that Lisa Raitt is?