As we know, masculinities and patriarchy are ways in which many societies operate, and they create systems and structures that privilege men and cause challenges and problems for, and discrimination against, women.
As to the reference to militarized masculinities, this is practised in very significant ways within a military context. Again, it goes to the things we've been talking about: the construction of the prototype ideal soldier, the way in which leadership and command are exercised and the way in which power and privilege are accrued and practised. These things are different and unique in a military context. What the extensive literature in this domain tells us is that we need to challenge them. We need to have fundamental changes, and that starts with making sure those who have been accruing these privileges earn self-insight and self-understanding about who they have become and how that has influenced them and the way they see the world.
My last quick comment is that the military is one of the least self-reflective professions of all. In many other professions—medicine, certainly organized religion and others—practitioners are constantly encouraged to reflect on how their professional practice influences how they see the world. That would be a helpful thing for the military to engage in, in a fairly systematic way.