If I can start with that one, I would point out—and both Dr. English and I are quite familiar with the volume on “Duty with Honour”—that there was a conscious reason why the word “honour” was connected in there. The concept there is that it's not sufficient to get the job done, that it's not sufficient to do your duty. You must do it in a way that earns honour. I think that in some parts of the CAF, unfortunately, that message has been disconnected.
I think the emphasis, the recognition.... The CAF serves Canadians and, at the end of the day, it's Canadians who have to be looking at their military with pride. I think that one of things this committee and Parliament as a whole can do is help to express the will of Canadians in terms of what they are expecting from their military, and I believe Canadians expect their military to earn honour. That is one of the key messages I would want to communicate.